- š”Ā AI Idea: Template emails sent to targets (such as legislators/companies) are all the same. We need more variation and personal stories.
- Situation-Complication-Resolution
- 'SCAMPER'
- 'Reciprocity Bias'
- 'Attribution Bias'
- Social Identity Theory
- Supporter Journey Map
- 'Storytelling'
- The bill, championed by Senator Roger Marshall (R-KS) and Representative Ashley Hinson (R-IA), bears a striking resemblance to the notorious āKing amendment.ā This amendment, which was met with significant bipartisan opposition, was an attempt by former Rep. Steve King to enact it as part of the 2014 and 2018 Farm Bills.
- The implications of the EATS Act are vast and concerning. It has the potential to nullify multiple state laws that promote animal welfare, food safety, and other critical issues. These include laws related to pesticide application, arsenic in food, protection against lead poisoning, and even child labor. Such a sweeping act could undermine the very fabric of our state's autonomy and the will of its citizens.
prefilled by organization to be filled by individual Prompt for GPT: You are a concerned constituent of [legislator]. Please write a concise, respectful, and professional email using the [choose framework i.e. 'Situation-Complication-Resolution'] framework [in support/against issue/legislation]. Highlight your personal story (to be included at the end). Make sure to include one or two of the following talking points that are relevant to the personal story: [main talking points]. Write naturally and in a narrative format and take out any section headings that would reveal the framework. Make sure the Subject line includes the bill number and whether you are in support or against.
Personal Story: [insert personal story from supporter] Variations of signing off, [Your Name] [Your Address] [City, State, Zip Code] [Email Address] [Phone Number] Form for supporter: Fill out the following information:
Please write 1-3 sentences about how you found out about this issue, why it personally matters to you, and how it impacts your local community: [insert personal story]
End with offering to speak with the legislator if they have the time. (conditionally added if they say yes) Would you be willing to speak with your legislator if they were interested in hearing more? (having a conversation increases your impact dramatically and we can provide a toolkit with speaking points)
select [yes or no]
You are a concerned constituent of [Betty Mcullen]. Please write a CONCISE and respectful email using the ['Anchoring Bias'] framework [oppose the EATS Act (H.R. 4417/S. 2019)]. Highlight your personal story (to be included at the end). Make sure to include ONLY one or two of the following talking points, choosing the ones most relevant to the personal story: [1. The bill is led by Senator Roger Marshall (R-KS) and Representative Ashley Hinson (R-IA). This bill is a rehash of the notorious āKing amendmentāāthe infamous measure that former Rep. Steve King tried unsuccessfully to enact as part of the 2014 and 2018 Farm Bills, generating overwhelming bipartisan opposition.
2. The EATS Act could wipe out multiple state laws aimed at promoting animal welfare and food safety, as well as state laws on many other issues including pesticide application on fields, arsenic in food, protection against lead poisoning, chemicals in baby food, pollution standards for spraying sewage on crops, flammability standards for cigarettes, and child labor.
3. A Diverse set of more than 170 groups strongly opposed the King amendment, including the National Governors Association, National Conference of State Legislatures, National Farmers Union, National Dairy Producers Organization, Humane Society Legislative Fund, Consumer Federation of America and Natural Resources Defense Councilāplus hundreds of federal and state legislators, individual farmers, veterinary professionals, faith leaders, and legal experts. 4. State laws are put in place to uphold the decisions and interests of their constituents from within their borders. They are not meant to serve the interests of industries located in other states.] Other instructions: Start the email off with a creative and professional greeting. Please write naturally and in a narrative format and REMOVE any section headings that would show the framework used. Make sure the Subject line includes the bill number and whether you are in support or against. End with offering to speak with the legislator if they have the time. Personal story: [I was so happy when Prop 12 was upheld in the supreme court as it seemed like the first time farm animals would be protected in some form in the law. I was really dismayed to find out that the EATS Act was being introduced right afterwards. It seems like the animal agriculture industry lobbyists just canāt take a message from voters. I would want Minneapolisā ballot measures to be upheld if the citizens voted for it.]
Subject: Opposition to the EATS Act (H.R. 4417/S. 2019)
Dear Representative Betty Mcullen,
I hope this email finds you well. As a resident of Minneapolis and an active member of our community, I wanted to share my perspective on a matter that deeply concerns me.
Recently, I was elated when Prop 12 was upheld in the Supreme Court. It felt like a monumental step forward, signaling the first time farm animals would receive some form of protection under the law. This decision resonated with many, including myself, who believe in the humane treatment of animals and the importance of upholding the will of the voters. However, my joy was short-lived upon learning about the introduction of the EATS Act right after this landmark decision. It's disheartening to see that despite clear messages from voters, the influence of animal agriculture industry lobbyists remains persistent.
I'd like to draw your attention to two critical points regarding the EATS Act:
I believe that if Minneapolis' ballot measures were to be voted upon and passed, they should be respected and upheld. The voice of the people should always be paramount.
I understand the weight of the decisions you make on our behalf, and I appreciate the time you've taken to read my concerns. If you'd like to discuss this further, I am more than willing to speak with you directly.
Warm regards,
Jose Gutierrez
10 Main St
Minneapolis, MN, 29340
888-888-8888
Subject: Opposition to the EATS Act (H.R. 4417/S. 2019)
Dear Representative Betty Mcullen,
I hope this message finds you well amidst the challenges and opportunities of our current legislative landscape. My name is Jose Gutierrez, a resident of Minneapolis, and I'm reaching out to share my personal perspective on the EATS Act (H.R. 4417/S. 2019).
When the Supreme Court upheld Prop 12, I felt an overwhelming sense of relief and joy. For the first time, it seemed that farm animals would receive some form of protection under the law. This decision resonated with me deeply, as I believe in the importance of upholding the voice and will of the people. However, my elation was short-lived upon learning about the introduction of the EATS Act shortly after. It's disheartening to think that the clear message from voters could be so quickly overshadowed by the interests of the animal agriculture industry lobbyists.
I understand that the bill is led by Senator Roger Marshall (R-KS) and Representative Ashley Hinson (R-IA), and it bears striking similarities to the notorious āKing amendment.ā This amendment faced significant bipartisan opposition in the past, and for good reasons. The EATS Act has the potential to nullify multiple state laws, not only those related to animal welfare and food safety but also those addressing critical issues like protection against lead poisoning, chemicals in baby food, and child labor. As a Minneapolis resident, I believe in the importance of upholding the decisions made by our local communities. If the citizens of Minneapolis voted for specific ballot measures, they should be respected and implemented.
It's worth noting that a diverse set of over 170 groups, including the National Governors Association, National Farmers Union, and Humane Society Legislative Fund, opposed the King amendment. Their collective voice speaks volumes about the potential ramifications of such legislation.
I kindly urge you to consider the broader implications of the EATS Act and the message it sends to constituents like me who believe in the power of local decision-making and the importance of animal welfare.
If you have the time, I would be honored to discuss this further and share more about my perspective. Your understanding and consideration mean a lot to the people of Minneapolis and to me personally.
Warm regards,
Jose Gutierrez 10 Main St Minneapolis, MN, 29340 Jose@gmail.com 888-888-8888